Attorney General Ellison opposes Trump DOJ’s frivolous challenge to California’s elections
Joins 22 AGs in arguing lawsuit has no constitutional basis, risks disenfranching eligible voters, and is deliberate act of bad faith
Amicus brief is latest action in long record of success in defending safety and integrity of Minnesota’s elections
October 22, 2026 (SAINT PAUL) — Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has joined a coalition of 22 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in opposition to the federal government’s recent baseless lawsuit against California’s elections. The lawsuit is part of the Trump administration’s broader efforts to sow doubt about the legitimacy of the midterm elections, including Minnesota’s.
In the lawsuit, the administration wants to prevent California elections officials from counting the ballots of more than 20,000 individuals who the U.S. Department of Justice claims, without any proof, are “likely” noncitizens. This unverified claim echoes similar allegations the federal government made against 16,000 individuals in Nevada earlier this year — none of whom DOJ has confirmed to be noncitizens.
However, the Constitution empowers states to run elections in line with federal laws that Congress established, not nakedly political policies dictated by the President or the executive branch. The amicus brief that Attorney General Ellison and the coalition filed in this case argues that the Trump DOJ lawsuit has no constitutional basis, appears to be a deliberate act of bad faith by the administration, would portend chaos for state and local election officials nationwide if successful, and creates the intolerable risk of disenfranchising voters.
“Donald Trump and his minions keep showing they will stop at nothing to undermine our elections,” Attorney General Ellison said. “We, however, have the law and the constitution on our side, and I’ve been using both to defend Minnesota’s nation-leading elections and the elections in every state that Trump has baselessly attacked. Trump thinks your freedom to vote is contingent on voting only for candidates or parties he approves of. That’s one of the most deeply un-American things I can think of. I’ll never stop fighting to protect Minnesotans’ freedoms against Trump’s tyranny.”
The President has aggressively pushed false claims of widespread election fraud for years, which have been rejected by independent experts and dozens of court rulings where such challenges have been brought. In the last year, courts have rejected multiple executive orders and agency rules that would have taken control of elections from states, while Congress has refused to pass legislation demanded by the President that would have imposed new burdens on voters. The DOJ has also demanded confidential state voter registration lists and threatened state officials with prosecution, which more than two dozen courts have found illegal.
Now, less than two weeks before the midterm election, the DOJ continues making impossible and unconstitutional demands of state and local elections officials. Their lawsuit against California asserts the federal executive branch can direct state officials to either not count a person’s vote based on unverified allegations or else face criminal prosecution.
However, Congress has previously established detailed voter list maintenance requirements for states, consistent with its constitutional authority under the Election Clause, and DOJ’s lawsuit does not allege any violation of those requirements, Rather, Attorney General Ellison and the coalition argue that DOJ seeks in its lawsuit against California to invent new, unconstitutional powers over elections.
Attorney General Ellison’s record of success in defending Minnesota’s elections against illegal federal interference
This amicus brief is the latest step in Attorney General Ellison’s longstanding defense of Minnesota’s nation-leading elections against illegal federal interference. This work includes:
- A September 2026 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that kept in place a stay on a U.S. Postal Service rule that that would have imposed burdensome requirements on vote-by-mail systems ahead of the November 3 midterm elections and caused chaos in Minnesota’s constitutional prerogative to administer elections. In August 2026, Attorney General Ellison and a coalition of attorneys general sued to block the rule.
- A June 2026 court ruling that permanently blocked Trump’s March 2025 executive order that attempted to conscript state election officials in his campaign to impose documentary proof of citizenship requirements for voter registration. In April 2025, Attorney General and a coalition sued to block the executive order.
- Another June 2026 court ruling that blocked Trump’s March 2026 executive order that purported to establish a national voter list and direct the Postal Service to send mail-in ballots only to voters on its list. An April 2026, Attorney General Ellison and a coalition of attorneys general sued to block the executive order.
Joining Attorney General Ellison in filing the amicus brief are Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, who led the coalition, and the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai‘i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

